2 Comments

The terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist" really control how we think ... but all you need to do is blow away the magic propaganda dust to see how.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/11-logical-fallacies-unmasked-in

Expand full comment

From the getgo I knew there was no special virus because they told us they were perpetrating a psyop on us by presenting very obvious nonsense, eg: telling us that a Chinese research team had found the many-banded krait and Chinese cobra to be "reservoirs" of the virus but that this claim was rubbished by a biosecurity specialist at Sydney University (debunked nonsense claims being a typical feature of psyops); telling us that a hospital had been erected in 48 hours and showing us images of people falling flat on their face and laid out on hospital floors.

As we can know that in psyops they do what they want for real and fake the rest (which only makes perfect sense) and I knew they didn't want a virus, they only wanted us to believe in one and that a real virus (at the time I thought such a thing existed) wouldn't work for their narrative I thus also knew from the getgo there was no virus and that anything presented as a "vaccine" was not in any shape or form what it was purported to be.

WHAT I DIDN'T KNOW ...

That germ theory and vaccines had been criticised by scientists and doctors from the moment of their inception and that, in fact, no virus has ever been proven to be isolated nor any vaccine effective.

The people you cite in your article, Donald, I would call "controlled opposition".

These people are more connected to the fundamental truth:

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/dissenters-of-the-covid-narrative

What you say about language is very interesting and just a couple of days ago something about the power of language had me floored. I subscribe to a YT channel, Pasta Grammar, presented by an American man, Harper, and his Calabrese wife, Eva, who is a very good cook. Due to it being Thanksgiving time, in the most recent episode, as an experiment, Eva made three Italian desserts using, in one case, what we call in Australia butternut pumpkin but what is called in North America butternut squash. While Harper argued that the vegetable is really a squash (and tastes like squash), Eva argued that in Italian whether squash or pumpkin the term is "zucca". It seems that both squash and pumpkin are members of the same family and that what distinguishes pumpkin is a hard skin ... which would mean that butternut is, better termed, as we do in Australia, a pumpkin. To me butternut pumpkin is not very different at all from other pumpkins and just has a slightly sweeter taste. It has nothing more or less in common with the soft-skinned vegetables we term squash than other pumpkins - it has orange quite solid flesh and a relatively tough skin and similar taste. I have no idea what Harper means when he says, "It tastes like squash." What other vegetables called squash does it taste like I'd like to know.

Pasta Grammar - Italian desserts made with pumpkin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md1UcOcBRX8

Expand full comment