THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM HAS VULNERABILITIES YOU CAN HACK

How to go into attack mode.

The Government-Industrial complexes of nations and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) such as the World Economic Forum which shackle governments together are very large enterprises. These powerful enterprises are doing everything they can to kill people and wipe out human civilization so they can build a new social structure totally under their control. If they succeed, what is left of humanity will suffer under brutal slavery.

These enormous and deadly enterprises are frightening.

But it may surprise you to know that predators have several Achilles’ heal like vulnerabilities. If you know the fracture points of these monstrous enterprises, you can help destroy them.

I will begin by explaining the basic principles of social interaction. Then I apply these principles to large predatory enterprises to expose their weaknesses.

With this knowledge, you can stop complaining about predatory enterprises, go on the offensive, and attack them at their weakest points.

Social interactions

A social interaction occurs when one person transmits something, which is then received by another person. If a person transmits something that is never received by another person or a person receives something that was not sent by another person, then that is not a social interaction.

People combine social interactions to create social exchanges.

Social exchanges

A social exchange requires a minimum of two reciprocating social transfers. For example, person A transfers something to person B. In response, person B transfers something to person A. An exchange can include many transfers. People mentally assign which transfers belong to a reciprocal exchange. For clarity, people can verbally or legally declare the transfers included in a reciprocal exchange.

In a pro-social exchange, both people consider the sum of transfers to be fair and/or beneficial. Consequently, both people agree to the transfers. Beneficial exchanges encourage future social interactions.

In an anti-social exchange, one person forces or deceives another person into unfair and/or harmful transfers. The person harmed does not agree with the exchange. Even so, the anti-social person forces harm upon their victim. Anti-social exchanges discourage future interactions.

This article is about anti-social exchanges where a person causes great harm to others. I refer to such a person as a predator and its victims will be called prey.

An example of a predator in the animal kingdom is a lion which delivers lethal force upon an antelope, killing it. Then the lion eats the body of the antelope. This is quite a harmful and unfair exchange.

A human example is a criminal that beats a person to the ground and takes their valuables.

Multiple social exchanges create social relationships, as explained next.

Social relationships

A social relationship occurs when two people perform a series of exchanges, creating an expectation of similar exchanges in the future. The relationship is enhanced when people consciously work toward a relationship. Verbal or legal commitments make the relationship even stronger.

In pro-social relationships, people use fair and/or beneficial exchanges to build powerful and beneficial relationships with commitments to take part in more pro-social exchanges in the future. Examples of social relationships are marriages, families, friends, and trusted business partners.

In anti-social relationships, one person (a predator) forces unfair and/or harmful exchanges upon the other (the prey). If this continues, both will expect similar exchanges in the future. Often, the predator promises to do harm. An example would be members of a gang extorting money from people.

Now that I have defined the basics of social interactions, I can explain the evolution of predatory enterprises.

Predatory enterprises

In this article, I use the word “enterprise” to reference very large social structures that include anywhere from thousands to billions of people.

But before I discuss the nature of predatory enterprises, I must describe their predecessors, starting with primitive predators.

The primitive predator-prey relationship

Human predatory relationships evolved from animal predator-prey relationships and have many of the same characteristics. To understand the nature of modern human predators requires a brief review of their ancestor – the relationship between a lion and an antelope.

The first strategy of a lion is to use various types of deception to gain an advantage. Examples are hiding, camouflaging, and faking movements.

The second strategy is to use threats, intimidation, and harassment to depress, confuse, panic, and manipulate the prey.

The third strategy is to use brute force to weaken, cripple, and kill the prey.

The last strategy is to consume all the valuables of the prey, which helps the predator survive and become stronger.

Beyond strategies, there are additional identifying characteristics of a predator.

The value system of a predator is all about his needs and wants. There is no consideration for the prey. Killing prey is just the normal business of life.

The goal of a predator is to force various unfair and harmful exchanges upon the prey. But the prey wants to escape and prosper. They can never reconcile their conflicting purposes.

The system level view of a predator-prey relationship exposes self destructive characteristics. If a predator kills all the prey, the predator will starve. If culling prey makes them healthier and stronger, then the predator can't kill them and the predator starves. If a predator has a bad day because of illness or injury, a team of prey or other predators can kill him. Also, predators are not productive, very destructive, and can't survive without the prey they are exterminating.

These faults of predators flow into modern predatory relationships, as explained next.

The master-slave relationship

The primary problem for primitive predators is finding and killing enough prey to survive. Humans were smart enough to solve this problem. They domesticated animals so they would always have plenty of prey close at hand that were easy to catch, kill, and eat. A modern day example is raising chickens to eat.

Primitive humans often treated captured enemy humans as domesticated animals. After humans developed language, they referred to human bondage as slavery or serfdom. In this article, I call it a master-slave relationship.

Most people believe that slavery is a type of organization. It is not. The best way to illustrate this is to analyze a simple two-level slave social structure consisting of a master and his slaves. And I analyze it by comparing the characteristics of slavery to a predator-prey relationship. I will start with goals and work down through all the characteristics.

The goals of a master is to maximize his benefits and minimize the benefits of the slaves. The goals of the slaves are to escape, live freely, and prosper. The master and slaves can never reconcile their conflicting purposes. This anti-social relationship inhibits future exchanges.

The value system of the master is all about his needs and wants. There is no consideration for slaves. Killing slaves is just the normal business of life.

The first strategy of a master is to use various types of deception to gain an advantage over the slaves. Ancient masters claimed to be gods with supernatural powers. The modern gods are authorities you can't question. And they lie about finance, health, medicine, science, principles of law, and government. Ignorance and misunderstanding about modern day technologies are used to cheat, harm, and weaken slaves.

The second strategy is to use threats, intimidation, and harassment to depress, confuse, panic, and manipulate the slaves. Government-Industrial complexes have numerous advanced methods to control citizens. One example is, kill one to scare thousands. Broadcast it on television and scare millions. Harassing citizens will cause various psychological diseases. But mental and medical treatments will fail until the harassment is removed or nullified by an understanding of these social principles.

The third strategy is to use force to weaken, cripple, and, when necessary, kill a slave. Modern masters weaken slaves by taking away their guns or any other weapons. Another tactic is to prevent communication and collaboration between prey. These and other tactics guarantee that the slaves can't oppose the master's use of force. Stealth force includes poisoning and other weapons which are difficult to detect.

The last strategy is to consume all the slaves’ assets, allowing the master to survive and become stronger. In modern societies, masters prefer using deception so that mass uprisings are avoided. Economic and legal trickery are used to take everything from slaves.

This comparison shows that a master of slaves is simply an evolved predator.

Now, the next predator evolution.

Modern slavery

Modern slavery has evolved into large enterprises, entrapping millions of people. Controlling so many people requires multiple levels of management.

An example is a pyramid management structure with the most evil predator at the top. The top predator manages five to ten generals that make up the second level of management. Each general manages five to ten majors that are the third level. This structure expands downward until it is large enough to supervise all the slaves. The combined predatory management levels are called the predator class.

At the boundary between the predator class and the slave class, the members of the lowest predator level manage five to ten members of the highest level of the slave class. Each slave in the highest slave level will manage five to ten slaves at the next lower slave level. This management structure expands downward to establish strict control of all slaves.

This structure is simpler than real predatory enterprises. Yet, it is adequate for demonstrating the characteristics of large predatory enterprises.

With few exceptions, the characteristic goals, values, and strategies of a predatory enterprise are the same as a lion attacking an antelope. If you have questions about this, please post them in the comments.

The primary evolutionary change is the multiple levels of management. This creates a gradual transition of characteristics from the top predator to the lowest slave. For example, the top predator knows all the evil plans of the enterprise. But each lower level of management knows less and less, until, at the lowest level of slaves, people are ignorant about reality and believe in a false storyline.

The unfair and harmful treatment between each level also gradually gets worse for each lower level. Because the oppression between levels is not as harsh as between a lion and an antelope, most people accept their position in the predatory enterprise.

At the lowest slave level, the abuse is so great that their lives are miserable and short. But the slaves are so mentally and physically weakened that they have to accept their condition as normal. Similar to how chickens feel about living on a poultry farm.

This overview provides enough knowledge about predatory enterprises so that I can now disclose their weaknesses.

How to disorganize a predatory enterprise

Exploit self-destructive tendencies

A large and modern predatory enterprise will still have the same faults as a primitive predator-prey relationship. Like a lion and an antelope, they can never reconcile their conflicting goals. The harmful and anti-social relationships continue downward through all levels. Without this heavy-handed control, all levels of management would disperse and the predators would fight amongst themselves for supremacy. This omnipresent oppression causes the following problems.

The harmful and nonproductive exchanges between all predators and slaves weaken all members and impoverishes the enterprise. As the enterprise declines, it becomes susceptible to internal revolt, external competition, and natural disasters. Predatory enterprises are so self destructive that they eventually devour themselves and die. An enterprise may find new societies to plunder, but this only delays the inevitable.

The predatory levels suffer from vicious infighting. Predators are always killing each other in competition for supremacy and spoils. A powerful strategy against predators is to boost their self-destructive nature. Any increase in stress on the predator class stimulates their instinct to kill. Just jailing a predator can cause other predators to go on a killing spree to take over his vacated territory. And the jailed predator may be suicided to keep him from providing incriminating evidence against other predators. You can find other ways to exploit the anti-social relationships between predators.

The upper slave levels can be educated about the deception, coercion, and harm committed by predators. They will revolt against their masters. Then the upper slave levels can help free the lower slave levels. You can't directly awaken the lower slave levels because they can't think for themselves.

Now another attack strategy.

Maneuver around the top-down management structure

A predatory enterprise must enforce a top-down management structure. Anything less than an iron fist control of underlings would cause a loss of command, revolt, revenge, and certain death for predators.

In contrast, when people engage in fair and beneficial exchanges, any social structure will be productive and stable. It could be top-down, bottom-up, or horizontal. In fact, there could be no structure at all. An example is publishing helpful information in books, patents, or on the Internet. The author may help others just because it makes him feel good. The people who benefit may never meet the author. You can benefit by reading a book written by Benjamin Franklin without connecting to Ben through social interactions, relationships, or structures.

Fair and beneficial social structures have additional powerful characteristics. A person can be a member of several overlapping or competing organizations and enjoy beneficial exchanges from all. A predator would face deadly conflicts if he were a member of multiple predatory enterprises.

Pro-social structures can be constructed or torn down as quickly as their members so desire. And the social structure can be any configuration. The possibilities are limited only by the imagination of the members.

The unlimited possibilities of pro-social organizations allow people to create teams that can out maneuver the rigid and fragile top-down structure of predatory enterprises.

Weak and fragile top-down organizations threaten the survival of societies and humanity. Nowhere in Nature do organisms or species depend on a single centrally controlled social structure for propagating and evolving future generations. There are always multiple, independent, competing organisms or organizations. And if a few of these entities make mistakes and die, others survive to advance the species. The preservation of societies and humanity requires multiple, independent organizations in friendly competition.

But there are more faults.

Slaves can use technology against masters

There are numerous advanced technologies. Modern societies are so complex that the predatory class can't understand what every slave is doing. Therefore, slaves can use technology to attack the predatory enterprise. When sabotage occurs, the only choice predators have is to degrade their technology. The anti-social nature of predatory enterprises reduces sharing of knowledge and skills, also dumbing down the entire enterprise. This weakening of the predatory enterprise will allow a competing pro-social organization to take control.

This is enough about faults for one article. Now a quick explanation of the differences between predatory enterprises and organizations.

Predators don't create organizations

I have taken great care in this article to not refer to predatory management structures as organizations. Predators do not create proper organizations. To qualify as an organization, all members must be aware of and agree to the values, goals, and strategies of the group. And they happily agree because they receive fair and beneficial exchanges from other members. Similar to the organization of the human body, internal organs perform fair and beneficial exchanges. Otherwise, the entire organism dies.

For more details about organizations, you can read, "Need help? 10+ ways to boost your productivity with powerful team strategies” and “How will humans survive and conquer this chaotic Physical Universe?”

Most people don't know the difference between a predatory management structure and an organization. Predatory enterprises are the source of this confusion because they are always deceiving people by pretending to be an organization and then trapping them into slavery. This error is the most common and deadly mistake people make.

Now you have enough information to understand the social structures you encounter.

So, what do you do?

Go from defense to offense

Government-Industrial complexes and NGOs like the World Economic Forum are attacking all of humanity. These predatory enterprises are enormous, powerful, and deadly. But they have Achilles’ heal like vulnerabilities. This article provides models for the basic social structure of these predatory enterprises. These simple models do not accurately emulate real-world enterprises. But they do provide enough knowledge to help you transition from defense to offense.

This information allows you to determine which groups are pro-social and which are anti-social.

Now you know their strategies, values, and goals.

You don't have to be a victim.

Predatory enterprises are frightening, but they are not invincible.

Now you can do more than just avoid predators or defend yourself.

Now you can plan strategic attacks.

And this is just the beginning.

Future articles will present additional details about how to attack predators.